Every trade is published before its outcome — at entry and at close, with chart images and timestamps. The table shown here is the actual record, not a sample.
The 160% annual figure is a backtest projection, not a proven record. Verify it yourself before believing anything on this page.
Read-only Myfxbook. The account is connected read-only to Myfxbook, which reads the broker’s own record — every closed trade is there, including the ones I never posted. Open the account page
Posted before the outcome. Entries and exits go to X, Bluesky and Threads before the result is known. Those timestamps are held by the platforms, not by me.
Archived off-site. Snapshots of this site are stored at the Internet Archive. Compare any snapshot with what you see now. See the archived copies
It is a demo account. Labelled as such on Myfxbook and on every post.
How this site earns. Affiliate commission from the broker — nothing else. It grows with trading volume, so this site never tells you to trade a bigger lot, or more often, than your own rule allows.
ZeroTrustFX publishes the complete trade history of a trading strategy projected to deliver an extraordinary 160% annual return — on X, YouTube, and other social media.That 160% is a projection that came out of backtesting, not a proven track record. But do not believe any of it as-is. Whether the published performance is real or fake is something you must verify for yourself.
How to verify it, which parts to doubt, and why — all of it is explained below, in order.
EntryResult
EntryResult
EntryResult
EntryResult
Every trade is published to social media in real time, at entry and at close. Wins, losses, timeouts — every result, with chart images and timestamps.
And still, you should keep doubting. In the age of generative AI, data, images, and video can all be forged convincingly. Look at information from only one direction, and you will be fooled by something with no contradictions — a coherent, useful-looking fake.
Investment information reveals itself as real or fake only after you test it. With most investment products, that moment of discovery is also the moment you lose money — sometimes more than you can recover, sometimes with real psychological damage. Fortunately, FX trading is different: an environment exists where you can verify risk-free.
Fund your demo account with a virtual $10,000
When the SNS notification arrives, place the same trade
It is simple, and it is the only verification method there is.
The trades you execute yourself are the one piece of evidence that absolutely cannot be fabricated.
You can spend weeks — months if you like — at zero financial risk, judging whether investment information that looks profitable is real or fake.
ZeroTrustFX is an automated system watching 17 currency pairs 24 hours a day, so you don't have to copy every trade. When a ZeroTrustFX notification happens to arrive while you're on your iPhone or PC, you spend a few dozen seconds placing the same entry or close order. Simple work, nothing more.
Watch the results for a few weeks to a few months, then decide: consider investing for real, or look elsewhere. Either answer is fine.
An option that removes the hassle of copying trades by hand is also being prepared.
Verification environment — the conditions for cross-checking
Every number on this page comes from one environment, and one only.
Exness Pro Account
Max leverage 1:2000 (that is the account ceiling; the effective leverage actually used is roughly 2-4x → Q29)
Cross-checking requires a demo account in the same environment. With a different broker, the same performance cannot be guaranteed. Tradable pairs and bid/ask prices differ from broker to broker. A wide spread alone can erase a +15 pip edge.
To measure with the same ruler, choose an Exness Pro Account if at all possible.
What you do today is three things — all free, and a few minutes in total. The detailed verification steps follow right below.
Follow ZeroTrustFX and turn on post notifications — any one of these is enough: Open XOpen BlueskyOpen Threads (the same posts go out to all three at the same moment). Platform APIs stumble now and then: a post can run late, or miss that one platform. Every entry still gets its exit — late rather than never. Following two of them covers that gap.
Subscribe on YouTube and turn on notifications: Open YouTube
Create your verification demo account (the button below)
No notifications, no verification. No account, no cross-checking. Finish these three today, and you can start verifying the moment the next ZeroTrustFX notification arrives. No deposit, no cost, and no registering with me.
If, after verifying on a demo account, you are convinced enough to deposit real money and trade on an account created through this link, the broker pays me a commission. It comes out of the broker’s own revenue, so you lose nothing and your costs do not go up. And it is exactly what keeps this record free and public. Just never reverse the order: verification first, money later.
Verification steps after opening your demo account
Install MetaTrader 5 (mobile or desktop)
Log in with your Exness Pro demo account credentials
Add the 17 target currency pairs to Quotes via "Add Symbol"
Enter the same pair, same lot size, same Buy or Sell
Set TP and SL at the same distances
For at least a few weeks, confirm that your demo account's trade history and ZeroTrustFX's posts are a near match.
A few weeks from now, if your history and my posts don't match — walk away. If they match, you can think about the next step then.
From here on — for those still doubting
You don't feel like creating an account — that is the correct reaction. Not being moved by a short pitch is exactly the attitude this page asks of its readers.
What follows is long. You don't need to read all of it. The headings closest to your particular doubt, plus the 32-question FAQ, are enough to judge with. Nowhere below will you find "why you can trust me" — only "how to check."
If you'd rather watch without an account first, start from Step 2 (→14). And if doubt remains after reading everything, that's fine. Bring the doubt with you into verification.
How to read what follows — the numbers don't move
Every statement below carries a serial number from 1 to 74. After publication, no numbers will be added and nothing will be renumbered. If a sentence is ever deleted, its number remains as a gap — and that gap is your warning. "A time series with no missing numbers" (→9) is a rule that applies not only to the trade record but to this page itself. The (→number) marks in the text and FAQ point to these numbers.
A. First, doubt this page
1
I have a request: do not believe this page. Verify it instead — and I will explain exactly how, in order.
2
One algorithm. Every trade published before its outcome. Wins, losses, timeouts — all of it.
3
There is nothing for sale — no course, no signals, no reveal of the entry logic. What you get is every result, nothing more. This line will not move.
4
Seventeen currency pairs monitored 24 hours a day, with no human touching entries or exits. My only job is to keep the record running.
5
In this world, the believers are the first to lose. So the entrance to this page is not belief — it is doubt.
Who this page is for
• People worn out by discretionary trading, looking for a system without emotions • People who assume EAs and automated trading are "all scams" — come exactly as skeptical as you are • People who want to find out whether "the real thing, published before outcomes" actually exists • And conversely: if you're looking for easy money, this page is useless to you. All it contains is a verification procedure.
The origin — why I'm doing this
In this industry, I have never met the real thing — not a real person, not a real trading system. What I met instead were fakes, more than I can count — and each one took a little of my money, my time, and my capacity to trust people. So I stopped searching and decided to build: to make the thing I had wanted to find, and put it in a public place — that is this page. But whether it is the real thing is not mine to declare. You verify, and you decide. And to be honest — I intend to profit from this too. That interest is fully disclosed on this page.
Why you must doubt high-performing copy trading
A year ago I put this to the test myself. I picked 10 strategies that ranked at the top of a major copy-trading service at the time, and allocated $1,000 to each on demo. One year later — 6 of the 10 had stopped: blown accounts. The four survivors returned +1.1%, +20.2%, +36.1% and +71.7% for the year (names withheld to avoid singling anyone out). Being top-ranked on the day I picked them guaranteed nothing about what came next. That is why this page shows no past ranking — it publishes every trade before its outcome instead. I am not asking you to trust me; I am asking you to verify the record. The actual screen one year later (names blurred). Shield icons mark the strategies that stopped — blown accounts; the figures show the survivors' one-year returns.
Why fully automated — Discipline
The reason people lose in the markets is usually not the strategy — it's failing to execute the same rule on the 500th time with the same face as the 1st. That's all. I call this a problem of Discipline. Not knowledge, not talent — whether you can keep doing the same thing regardless of mood. And humans only ever hold Discipline as a consumable — after a losing streak, on a night carrying open losses, on a morning without sleep. Any one of those, and the rule loses to "just this once." So I stopped counting on my own Discipline. Entries and exits are executed by the algorithm, and no human touches them (→4) — that, not speed or convenience, is why this is fully automated. The only work left to me is work that requires no Discipline: keeping the record running. And publishing before outcomes, so that even the record itself can be doubted.
B. Why you don't need to believe — proof for the age of AI synthesis
6
Chart images can be faked. Video can be AI-generated. Withdrawal screenshots and luxury-lifestyle photos are the cheapest props money can buy right now.
7
Only actual trade results cannot be manufactured — provided there is a third-party timestamp from before the outcome that I cannot edit. The post times on X and YouTube are exactly that.
8
Hence this format: every entry is posted while the position is open, and the market grades it in public.
9
Delete the inconvenient posts afterward, and the record looks clean. So nothing gets deleted — the unbroken time series itself is what you verify.Nor can I show you a hand-picked selection of trades: the account is connected read-only to Myfxbook, which lists every closed trade — including any I never posted. If the record on X and the list on Myfxbook disagree, that is your evidence that I filtered.
10
The stop-losses and timeouts in the record are there on purpose. A track record with no visible losses is not evidence — it is advertising.
11
Enough words — here are the current numbers: day ◯ since launch · ◯ entry posts / ◯ exit posts · ◯ wins / ◯ losses / ◯ timeouts · current drawdown ◯%. All auto-tallied from the posts already published. The figures are clickable — each one opens the X post it was counted from.
Day
◯
Entry / exit posts
◯
Wins
◯
Losses
◯
Timeouts
◯
Drawdown
◯%
These counters tally automatically from the public timeline posts. If they do not load here, the same numbers can be re-counted by hand from the X timeline.
This account opened on 22 July 2026 with $10,000 and grew to $10,782.59 during a pre-public test period (17 closed trades, 16 wins / 1 loss). Those 17 are excluded from the figures above — they were never posted in advance, and a record shown only after the fact cannot be verified by anyone, including this one.
Independently verified: this account is connected read-only to Myfxbook, which reconciles the history against the broker's own record. Note that Myfxbook's figures cover the entire account, including the 17 pre-public trades excluded above. Open the Myfxbook account page
12
Below that are embedded posts — the call, and its result a few hours later. Don't read the dates here; confirm them on X. Anything placed on this page could be doctored.
Rendered by X. If the dates matter to you, open them on X.
C. The 5-Step Verification Protocol — the correct way to use this page
13
Step 1: Doubt. Treat every claim on this page as unverified information. Everything from here is the procedure for checking it.
14
Step 2: Just watch the X posts for two weeks. Zero cost, zero deposits. Count the entry-call → result cycle with your own eyes.
15
Step 2 gets easier — follow on X and turn on post notifications, and every entry and result lands on your screen as it happens. Weekly recaps go up on YouTube as well. It costs nothing and needs no email address. To stop, just turn notifications off — a way for me to contact you never existed in the first place.
16
Step 3: Take the timestamps and entry prices of past posts and check them against MT5 price history. If anything was fabricated after the fact, it breaks here — always.
17
Step 4: Create a demo account in the same environment and run it alongside. Create the account first — if it's ready before you start counting in Step 2, you can cross-check from day one. My posts against your chart, every day.
18
Step 5: Two weeks in, you will land on one of three conclusions — the numbers held, so move forward (trade the entries yourself, at your own size); still not sure, so watch two more weeks; or this isn’t it, so leave. All three are correct answers. The one thing I ask you to avoid: "I believed, so I started." That one — never.
19
Notice that nowhere in this procedure is there a step called "trust me." That is the design of this page.
20
There are no shortcuts. Putting real money in today because two weeks feels too long — that is the one and only mistake on this page.
The scale of development — which proves nothing either
Reaching this algorithm took 6 to 9 years of history per pair across 5 timeframes (M15/M30/H1/D1/W1) — about 2.2 million candles in total. But the count that matters is not what went through; it's what got thrown away — 34 scenarios tested, 70 TP/SL combinations swept exhaustively, 10 generations of logic rewrites, 41 model retrainings. 119 candidate clusters were judged out-of-sample, and the 8 whose performance didn't hold were cut. All of that is a story about the cost I paid. And to you, it proves nothing — because you cannot verify any of these numbers. If I quietly changed a digit, no one would notice. So the place to look is not here, but ahead: the record posted before outcomes, and how the market settled it (→13-20). How much I bet on development is something only I need to know. What you need to check is one thing — the unbroken time series from launch day to today.And seeing that much searching, suspecting overfitting (curve-fitting) is the correct way to read it. I cannot talk you out of it. What I can do is show whether the pass criteria declared below are met by the forward record alone, after publication began. A model that was merely fitted to the past comes apart exactly there.
D. Expected performance — a baseline for doubt
21
Withheld for now — statement 21 goes with a growth-curve chart that is not on the page yet, so the text alone would say nothing. Not deleted: when the chart goes up, it returns as 21.
22
Assume drawdowns. The worst stretch in simulation cut the account by roughly a third.
23
If a −30% stretch would push you into quitting or revenge-trading, then don't copy this — that too is a legitimate, honest conclusion for verification to reach.
24
The design takes small, frequent wins in exchange for large, rare losses — that is why the curve grinds upward instead of leaping. No martingale, no grid, no averaging down. Fixed lots are what keep this curve survivable.— and it should be said up front that a design like this is supposed to show a high win rate. At the ratio in the published examples (+30 pips taken, −100 pips cut), the win rate at which you merely break even is already about 77%. So 80% or 90% is not proof of skill; it is the minimum this design needs in order to work at all. Do not judge this record by its win rate — judge it by Profit Factor and by expectancy after costs. Pass criteria ③ and ⑤ on this page measure exactly that. Forex risk-reward calculator
25
This strategy's horizon is years, not this month. So give your verification at least two weeks — a month if you can. And let me say this in advance: two weeks or a month tells you whether I am lying, not whether this makes money. The number of closed trades in that window is a dozen or so — statistically, nothing. That is exactly why the pass criteria are set at 200 trades and 6 months. The time you spend verifying is not, in itself, a reason to believe. If you catch yourself thinking 'I have checked this much, so it must be real,' you may not have been convinced by the record — you may have been convinced by your own effort. Watch for that above everything else.
For cross-checking during verification. No deposit required.
The pass criteria, declared in advance — do not trust this until these numbers exist
Let me state up front what it would take to call the projection above "proven": ① at least 200 closed trades, every one published before its outcome ② at least 6 months of observation ③ a Profit Factor (total pips won ÷ total pips lost) of 1.3 or higher ④ a maximum drawdown inside the declared range (about −30%) ⑤ a positive expectancy even after slippage and execution costs. Until all five are met, do not trust the numbers on this page. And if any one of them breaks, that fact stays on this page too. The bar will not be moved after the fact.
Independent verification — Myfxbook
You do not have to trust my own tally. This demo account is connected read-only to Myfxbook, an independent third-party service, and its trade history is automatically reconciled against the record on the broker's server (Track Record Verified). I cannot rewrite those numbers. Open the Myfxbook account page There you will find every trade, the take-profit and stop-loss levels, open positions, drawdown — and Profit Factor, average win / average loss and expectancy, all computed on Myfxbook's side. The part a win rate alone cannot tell you is right there too: this system pairs small, frequent wins with large, rare losses, so the average loss runs several times the average win. Nothing about that is hidden. Three things to note first. ① Myfxbook shows the account's entire history, which includes the 17 trades from before the public start (22 July – 11 August). Only the record from 11 August onward is verifiable. ② The green 'Trading privileges' badge only proves I own the account; Myfxbook holds no trading rights — it was given a read-only password and nothing else. ③ The current trade count and observation period fall far short of the pass criteria above. However good the numbers look, this is not yet 'proven'.
E. The verification environment — same-ruler conditions
26
Every number on this page comes from a single environment: an Exness Pro account, max leverage 1:2000.
27
Nothing has been verified anywhere else. Cross-checking requires a demo account in the same environment — verification with a different ruler is not verification.
28
Positions are held one to three days at most. Exness applies swap-free status to the accounts I use, so on the published account crossing a day boundary has cost nothing: every closed trade in its history shows zero swap, including positions held across several nights — check the swap column on Myfxbook. What does erase a +15 pip edge is a wide spread. That alone can do it.
29
You can create your verification demo account here: Open the account page. If you one day trade on an account created through this link, I receive a commission — at no extra cost to you.
30
That commission is what funds this free public record. Just keep one order fixed: verification first, money later.
F. What is sold here, and what might change
31
This section is about money: what I earn from this page today, and what could change later.
32
Right now this page does one thing. It publishes the verification record of an automated system I run for myself. That is the whole of it.
33
Nothing is sold here. No signals, no subscription, no paid community, no software, no course. There is no product to buy.
34
Whether I will ever offer a service or sell anything is not decided. Not planned, not scheduled, not designed — undecided.
35
What would make me think about it is simple. If enough people open an account through this page, verify for themselves, then fund it and trade, I will consider building something for them. Until that happens there is nothing to consider.
36
Undecided is not a promise and it is not an offer. There is no launch date, no countdown and no founding rate.
37
Until something exists, the only way I earn from this page is the broker's affiliate commission, disclosed on every link that carries it. It grows with trading volume, and that is a real conflict of interest, so here is the line I hold: nothing on this page will ever tell you to trade a bigger lot, or more often, than your own rule allows. The sizing rule and the emotion rule here cap you; they do not push you (→44, 48). If you publish a method worth following, you do not get to also profit from people overtrading it.
38
If that ever changes, the terms come first — what it is, what it costs, and the framework it runs under get written on this page before anything opens. Announcements go to X and YouTube. No sales emails, no sales DMs.
G. The craft of doubting high returns — the risks in choosing copy trading
39
The top returns in a copy-trading ranking are usually where the top risk hides.
40
Triple-digit monthly returns are, almost without exception, martingale or grid. The curve looks smooth until the day the account dies.
41
High returns with under three months of history — no one can yet tell skill from luck. Apply the same standard to my record.
42
The order for choosing a strategy: max drawdown and record length first, return % last.
43
A curve that never sinks is not skill — it is postponed risk. A real edge breathes.
H. The practical guide for anyone copying trades
44
One rule for lot sizing: with a 100-pip SL, 0.1 lot per $10,000 of capital risks about 1%. Size larger than this, and you are running a different strategy.
45
No cherry-picking. Copy only the entries that look good, and this strategy's numbers will not reproduce in your account. Take all of it, or none of it.
46
Wanting to start right after a winning streak is normal psychology — and behind a winning streak, mean reversion is waiting. Don't pick your start date by recent results.
47
Losses arrive in clusters. Even at an 80%-class win rate, three losses in a row happen as a matter of course — see it once during verification, and in live trading it's statistics, not an accident. In numbers: three −100 pip losses in a row is −300 pips — ten +30 pip wins just to get back to where you were.
48
"The amount at which you can watch your stop-loss execute without your feelings moving" — your correct size is below that.
I. If you ever copy anyone — the rails that must hold
49
Whoever you copy, your funds should stay in your own broker account to the end, stoppable at any time, with no lock-up and no penalty. Money sent to an operator's own account is a different and worse arrangement.
50
Fees should apply to profit only, with a high-water mark. Recovering ground you already paid fees on should never be charged twice, and a flat month should cost nothing.
51
Allocate only part of your investable funds to any single strategy. Including mine. Especially mine.
52
Before copying anyone, open the platform's own track-record page and read it yourself — return, maximum drawdown, months running. That page outranks whatever the operator writes about themselves, this page included.
Q32How much money do I need to start?
Recommended account: Exness Pro. The published record runs on a Pro account. On an account with wider spreads, part of each target is eaten before you keep it, and the record also holds several positions at the same time — so leave headroom in your margin. The minimum deposit for an Exness Pro account is $1,000. If you trade the entries yourself, the size is your decision — see the lot rule (→44).
J. Impersonators and scams — the prime target for your doubt
53
I never send DMs, and I answer questions only in public (X replies). Any "me" that DMs you is an impersonator, every time.
54
If anyone proposes "send money directly to me and I'll trade it for you" — that is 100% fraud. Once more: in this structure, payments to me do not exist.
55
If someone speaks in my name of guaranteed profits, protected principal, or "hurry, now only" — that is not me. Those words appear nowhere on this page.
56
The official links are the ones on this page and in the SNS profiles — nothing else. No mirror sites, no unofficial translations, no authorized resellers, no LINE, no Telegram, no private community. If an invitation arrives, it is a scam.
FAQ — 31 expected questions
FAQ-1. The record and trust
Q1Are you actually winning?
Don't ask me. Count in Step 2, cross-check in Step 3 (→13-20). The final answer to every question on this page is: verify.
Q2Does a demo-account record even mean anything? Why not real money?
It stays a demo so the verification environment never moves a millimeter. This page does not claim real-money proof; what it has is an unbroken demo record, each trade published before its outcome. The demo status is disclosed on every post, hidden from no one.
Q3How can you prove the images and videos aren't AI-generated?
I won't prove it. This proof exists in only one form: "you tried to break it in Step 3, and couldn't" (→16). If you can break it, leave.
Q4What proves you don't delete inconvenient posts afterward?
The unbroken time series, and third-party timestamps I cannot edit (→7, 9). You are welcome to save everything to an external archive service — in fact, please do.
Q5Why no face, no name?
Because faces and names are not evidence. Like withdrawal screenshots, they are cheap props now (→6). What deserves verification is the record, not the person.
Q6Why free? What’s the catch?
The catch is printed on the page. My interest is the affiliate commission — that one, nothing else (→71). It grows with trading volume, so here is the tell to watch for: if this page ever starts nudging you toward bigger lots or more trades, the catch has arrived, and that is a legitimate reason to write me off. If you ever find a hidden revenue stream on top, same answer.
Q7Isn't this just a new form of scam?
Good question. The scam kit has three parts: make you send money, make you hurry, keep you from verifying. Here, there is no route for sending me money (→54), no deadlines or pressure (→37, 38), and the verification procedure sits at the top of the page (→13-20). Confirm all three inversions yourself.
Q8What happens when you hit a losing streak?
The posting doesn't stop — not stopping is this project's product (→58). And if the record falls below the pre-declared quality bar, I write that on this page without dressing it up (→59). You watch the whole process in public — and you can leave at any point.
Q9Couldn't AI reverse-engineer the logic from the trade history?
Please try — I welcome it as another form of verification. But even a successful approximation gets you a still photo of the rules at one point in time. When the market changes, the machinery that maintains them is not in your hands. What I publish is not logic — it is a record, and the posture that keeps it running (→3, 58).
Q10Not just you — how do I know if any trader's track record is real?
Five checks that work on anyone: ① Are there timestamps from before the outcome? (after-the-fact win reports mean nothing) ② Are there gaps or deletions in the record? ③ Are the timestamps on a third-party platform the person cannot edit? ④ Are the losses (stops, timeouts) visible? ⑤ Is the verification environment reproducible? If a record fails any of the five, don't use it as evidence — and apply this standard to me first (→13-20).
FAQ-2. Copying and participating
Q11How much do I need to start?
Verification costs zero (demo account). The amount for going live is yours to decide, using the sizing rule (→44) and the emotion rule (→48). I don't recommend amounts. New to FX? Spend the first month watching with zero trades — cross-checking the posts against your own demo chart is plenty of education on its own.
Q12If I enter after seeing the post, am I too late?
Entry posts go out after execution. Following by hand adds minutes of delay and slippage, so your results will differ slightly from my record. Measuring that gap in your environment is exactly what Step 4 is for. If you judge the gap too wide to close, the correct answer is not to trade it.
Q13Can I use a broker other than Exness?
I won't stop you. But verification happened only on an Exness Pro account (→26, 27), so results in a different environment cannot be checked against this record. Even within Exness, a Standard account changes the conditions (spread, swap, etc.) — do your cross-checking on Pro.
Q14Can I participate from my country?
The eligible regions are decided by Exness, and they differ by country. The registration form behind the link is the judge, so checking there is definitive (→69). Just proceed to account opening — you'll know right away.
Q15Can I verify with just a phone?
Step 2 (watching) happens entirely on X and YouTube. Step 4 (the demo parallel run) works on MT5 mobile. Only Step 3 (price-history cross-checks) is easier on desktop MT5.
Q16How many trades per week?
A few per week on average — unevenly distributed. There are weeks with zero, and days with three. A quiet week is not a malfunction; it's the spec (→63).
Q17Is there a signal service or a paid group?
No. The public posts are the entire record; no "special information" exists beyond them. Anything calling itself "exclusive" is fake, all of it (→56).
Q18Can I just open the account and leave it?
Of course. A dormant demo account costs zero. "Open it, let it sleep, keep verifying" — that is exactly the order this page recommends (→30).
FAQ-3. What is not being sold
Q19Is there a copy-trading service, or a paid signal service?
No. Neither exists and neither is scheduled. This page publishes a record; it sells nothing (→33).
Q20Will you ever sell something?
It is not decided. If enough readers verify and go on to trade a funded account, I will think about what would be worth building for them — and whatever it turns out to be, the terms get published here before it opens (→34, 38).
Q21Why publish all this if nothing is for sale?
The broker pays a commission on accounts that trade. That is disclosed on every link and it is the only revenue here. The record is what makes it reasonable for anyone to open one (→37).
Q22Then what do I get out of verifying?
The record, and a method you can point at anything else that claims a result. If the strategy holds up in your own check, the entries are public and you can trade them at your own size (→18).
Q23How would I hear about it if something were offered?
Follow on X or YouTube. Announcements land there first (→38).
Q24If there are losses, whose responsibility is it?
Yours, always. Nothing here manages your money or places an order in your account. All the more reason never to exceed your emotion-rule amount (→48).
Q25Does the record change if more people follow it?
High-liquidity pairs only, fixed lots — at the foreseeable scale the impact should be small. If we ever approach a scale where it matters, I will say it here first (→K).
Q26Wouldn’t results differ between a demo account and a real account?
Yes — but not because of swap. Exness applies swap-free status to the accounts I use, the published demo and my real accounts alike: every closed trade in the demo’s history shows zero swap, including positions held across several nights, and you can check the swap column on Myfxbook. So there is no swap handicap hidden in the demo numbers, and nothing to expect back on a real account. Whether swap-free applies to your own account depends on Exness’s eligibility rules for your region — check the swap column on your account before you count on it. The differences that remain all work against you — spread, slippage and execution — and they are listed under the question about live accounts below. Treat the demo figures as a ceiling.
Q27Why is there no company information or legal-disclosure page?
Because nothing is sold here. No paid products, no signal service, no software for sale, no paid community — no transaction in which you pay me, so the disclosure obligations that come with selling do not arise. I do not provide investment advice or manage anyone’s money; this page only publishes my own record, and every decision stays yours. If that ever changes, the required disclosures and conditions are added to this page before anything is offered (→38). Contact is via public replies on X (@zerotrustfx) — I will never solicit you by DM.
Q28If you earn more when people trade more, won’t you inflate the trade count?
That suspicion is structurally valid, and I am not going to soften it: the commission scales with volume, so the way to make it large would be to push you into bigger lots and more trades than your account can survive. I will not do that, and the page is built so you can catch me if I ever start. ① The commission only arises from real-account trading. While you verify on demo I earn nothing at all, so the frequency you observe is the frequency you get. ② Entry frequency and lot size are fixed by the algorithm and do not change as readers join. If the frequency ever spikes, that change sits in the public record — be suspicious. ③ Every sizing instruction on this page is a ceiling, not a floor: 0.1 lot per $10,000 with a 100-pip stop, about 1% risk (→44), and below the amount at which you can watch a stop execute without your feelings moving (→48). Nowhere here will you find a reason to trade larger. The day you do, the conflict has won, and you should leave.
Q29Isn't 1:2000 maximum leverage far too dangerous?
The account's ceiling and the amount actually used are different things. This system trades a fixed lot (0.35 lots per $10,000), which works out to an effective leverage of roughly 2–4x — a tiny fraction of the 1:2000 ceiling. The high ceiling exists to keep margin-level headroom during drawdowns, not to size up positions. Any operation that actually uses 1:2000 in full — on this page or anywhere else — dies on its first broken rule. During your verification you can also confirm from the record that the lot size never moves from what is declared.
Q30Would offering copy trading be subject to regulation?
It can be. The moment other people’s money follows automatically, the legal position is no longer the same as publishing my own record — the UK FCA and the EU’s ESMA have both published supervisory points noting that copy trading can amount to investment advice or portfolio management. Nothing is offered today and nothing is scheduled. If it ever is, it would run inside an existing regulated platform’s framework, with eligibility and regional availability decided by that platform. Where it cannot be offered, it will not be offered — and this page would state plainly under which framework and which entity it operates.
Q31Will the results you see on demo carry over to a live account?
No. The gap always goes against you. Three reasons, all of them costs. (1) Spread: even on a Pro account it widens in the early hours and around news releases. (2) Slippage: market orders fill on the worse side. (3) Following by hand adds delay on top of that (→65). And because this design takes profit at around +30 pips, a slip of a few pips per trade weighs heavily in proportion — this is the weakest point of the strategy. That is why pass criterion ⑤ reads "expectancy still positive once slippage and execution costs are included." Treat the demo figures as a ceiling, before costs are subtracted.
K. The continuity pledge
57
Every weekly video carries every trade of that week. Red weeks do not get edited out of existence.
58
Losing streaks do not stop the posts. The not-stopping is itself this project's product.
59
If the record falls below the pre-declared quality bar, I write it on this page without dressing it up. No quiet disappearance.
60
The strategy's rules and the record's origin (the launch date) were fixed before publication and will not move. The moment they are adjusted mid-flight, the record's value drops to zero.
61
Screenshot this page and keep it. You are welcome to confront the future me with today's words.
62
Being able to say "this was designed to be doubted" — that is this project's one and only boast.
L. Final calibration, and the close
63
Boredom is the default. On most days nothing happens — that is not a malfunction; it is how this strategy stays alive for years.
64
Past performance does not guarantee future results — a legal boilerplate line, written here as a sincere warning.
65
Copied executions lag the original by seconds, and results differ slightly. "Almost the same experience," not "identical," is the correct expectation.
66
As you can tell by now, what you do today is not investing. Create the free demo account, and go back to Step 1 — start from doubt.
67
And a few weeks from now, if you decide to proceed — proceed doubting, small, and by the rules. Welcome.
In closing — today's task is what I told you at the start
② Choose “Google” — registering with your Google account is the fastest and surest way (no e-mail form, no new password).
Then create the demo account with the same settings as the published record (Pro / 1:2000 leverage / $10,000 / MT5):
③ In “My accounts”, tap “Open account”.
④ Swipe to the “Pro” account type and tap “Continue”.
⑤ Stay on the “Demo” tab, set Starting balance to 10000 and Max leverage to 1:2000.
⑥ Choose “MT5” as the platform, then tap “Create account”. Your verification demo account is ready.
The interest behind this link is disclosed (→29, 30). Keep the order fixed — verification first, money later.
Already opened your account? — verification continues on X and YouTube
Daily entries and results are published on X; weekly recaps (wins/losses, pips, current drawdown) go up on YouTube. Zero selling mixed in (→38). If anything is ever offered, the announcement lands in those same places first. No email registration needed.
The same posts also go out on Bluesky and Threads, at the same moment.
Tap “Follow”, then the bell 🔔 and choose “All Posts”. Every entry and result lands on your screen as it happens — free, and one tap to turn off.
Not opening an account yet? — start with two weeks of watching X (→14, 15). No cost, no registration.
M. Disclaimers
68
CFD trading carries a high risk of loss. Trade only with money whose loss would not affect your life. This page is not investment advice.
69
The published account is a demo. The regions where Exness can offer accounts vary by country and over time — check whether you qualify on the registration form behind the link.
70
This page is informational and does not solicit the purchase of any specific financial product. Investment decisions are your own responsibility.
71
This page's financial interests, in full: affiliate commissions. Nothing is sold here and nothing is scheduled to be. No paid placements, no sponsorships. That commission grows with trading volume, so this page holds one line without exception: it never encourages a larger lot or a higher trade count than your own rule allows (→37). If that ever changes, the terms are written here before it opens (→38).
72
This page is intended for adults 18+ (21+ in some regions).
73
Tax treatment depends on your country of residence. If you make profits, report them according to your local rules.
74
This page may be updated without notice. Material changes remain on the page as a change log.
